zapplyjobs/new-grad-data-science-jobs-2027

0

/ 100

Documentation61
Engineering29
Health68
HTML47Other1d ago
Grade a repo

Some interest. A stronger README and CI would help.

2027 entry-level data science & ML jobs — analytics, AI, quant & machine learning US roles

Documentation

61

Contributing guide5pt5

No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).

→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.

Install and run instructions9pt45

No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).

→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.

README12pt78

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under Other.

Engineering

29

Tests18pt0

No tests detected anywhere in the repository.

→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Reproducibility6pt0

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

→ Commit the lockfile for this project's package manager so installs produce the same dependency versions everywhere.

CI/CD14pt57

CI is configured (.github/workflows/workflow-lint.yml).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

68

Dependency manifest6pt0

No dependency manifest detected at root.

→ Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 3
    Forks
  • 0
    Releases

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 47
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • —
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 2
    Open issues
Repository files13 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/workflow-lint.yml).
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • config
  • images
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .gitmodules
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
    Good: Code of conduct present.
  • CONTRIBUTING-GUIDE.md
  • CONTRIBUTORS.md
  • index.html
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under Other.
  • llms.txt
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Issue: README has some structure (−7 pts). 2-3 headings earns partial credit; 4+ earns the full +15 pts.Fix: Add more sections (Overview, Install, Usage, Contributing) using ## headings.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.