wukongsecurity/spiderbox

0

/ 100

Documentation44
Engineering20
Health100
CSS144AGPL-3.01d ago
Grade a repo

Getting noticed, but rough fundamentals could turn visitors away.

SpiderBox - 虫盒 - 爬虫逆向资源导航站

Documentation

44

Install and run instructions9pt0

No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).

→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.

Contributing guide5pt0

No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).

→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.

README12pt68

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under AGPL-3.0.

Engineering

20

Tests18pt0

No tests detected anywhere in the repository.

→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

CI/CD14pt40

CI is configured (.github/workflows/article_data_to_yml.yml).

Reproducibility6pt70

Lockfile present (script/requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (script/requirements.txt).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 26
    Forks
  • 0
    Releases

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 144
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 7d 8h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 0
    Open issues
Repository files11 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/article_data_to_yml.yml).
  • data
  • script
    Good: Lockfile present (script/requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
    Good: Dependency manifest found (script/requirements.txt).
  • static
  • themes
    Good: Licensed under AGPL-3.0.
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .hugo_build.lock
  • hugo.toml
  • LICENSE-AGPL
  • LICENSE-APACHE
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Issue: README has some structure (−7 pts). 2-3 headings earns partial credit; 4+ earns the full +15 pts.Fix: Add more sections (Overview, Install, Usage, Contributing) using ## headings.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.