Polished and well engineered. Punching above its star count.

OpenBiliClaw 是纯本地、私有、开源的自进化跨平台内容发现 Agent:从你的跨平台使用、反馈与对话中持续深化心理画像,带着对你的理解主动去 B 站、小红书、抖音、YouTube、X 与 Web 等来源找内容 / Fully local, private, open-source, self-improving discovery agent: deepens your psychological profile from cross-platform usage, feedback, and dialogue, then finds content across Bilibili, Xiaohongshu, Douyin, YouTube, X, and the web.

Documentation

95

Contributing guide5pt86

Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.

Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

85

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Reproducibility6pt80

Lockfile present (uv.lock). Installs are reproducible.

Tests18pt100

Test files detected (extension/tests).

CI/CD14pt100

CI is configured (.github/workflows/build-installers.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured ([tool.ruff] / [tool.black] in pyproject.toml).

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 51
    Forks
  • 128
    Releaseslatest 1mo ago

Community

  • Community health
  • authors own >50% of commits
  • 741
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 10h
    Median issue response
  • 4h
    Median PR merge time
  • 23
    Open issues
Repository files21 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/build-installers.yml).
  • .planning
  • docs
    Issue: Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
    Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.
    Good: Contributing guide describes code style expectations.
    Good: Contributing guide explains how to run tests.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a PR workflow section (−8 pts).Fix: Explain how to fork, branch, and open a pull request so contributors know what to expect.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • extension
    Good: Test files detected (extension/tests).
  • packaging
  • scripts
  • skills
  • src
  • tests
  • .dockerignore
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • AGENTS.md
  • CLAUDE.md
  • config.example.toml
  • docker-compose.yml
  • Dockerfile
    Good: Environment pinned via Dockerfile.
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • pyproject.toml
    Good: Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).
  • README_EN.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • README.md
  • uv.lock
    Good: Lockfile present (uv.lock). Installs are reproducible.