weboftrust/keripy

0

/ 100

Documentation95
Engineering80
Health100
Python76Apache-2.01d ago
Grade a repo

Well engineered for its size. A portfolio piece worth showing off.

Key Event Receipt Infrastructure - the spec and implementation of the KERI protocol

Documentation

95

Contributing guide5pt83

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under Apache-2.0.

Engineering

80

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (tests).

Reproducibility6pt80

Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.

CI/CD14pt100

CI is configured (.github/workflows/python-app-ci.yml).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 73
    Forks
  • 1
    Releaseslatest 4y ago

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 76
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 10d 7h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 192
    Open issues
Repository files20 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/python-app-ci.yml).
    Good: Environment pinned via .github/workflows/interop/Dockerfile.
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • docs
  • images
  • interop
  • keri
  • ref
  • scripts
  • src
  • static
  • tests
    Good: Test files detected (tests).
  • .coveragerc
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .readthedocs.yaml
  • Contributing.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Good: Contributing guide describes code style expectations.
    Good: Contributing guide explains how to run tests.
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under Apache-2.0.
  • Makefile
  • publish.sh
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • requirements.txt
    Good: Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
    Good: Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).
  • setup.py