Polished and well engineered. Punching above its star count.

An MCP server for Azure DevOps

Documentation

93

Contributing guide5pt80

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

README12pt90

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt100

README documents how to install the project.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

84

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Reproducibility6pt70

Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.

Tests18pt100

Test files detected (src/shared/test).

CI/CD14pt100

CI is configured (.github/workflows/main.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (.eslintrc.json).

Project health

98

Dependency manifest6pt93

Dependency manifest found (package.json).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 123
    Forks
  • 43
    Releaseslatest 1y ago

Community

  • Community health
  • authors own >50% of commits
  • 376
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 13h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 33
    Open issues
Repository files34 root entries
  • .agents
  • .github
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/main.yml).
  • .husky
  • .kilocode
  • .pi
  • .vscode
  • docs
  • memory
  • project-management
  • src
    Good: Test files detected (src/shared/test).
  • tests
  • .clinerules
  • .env.example
  • .eslintrc.json
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.eslintrc.json).
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .prettierrc
  • AGENTS.md
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • commitlint.config.js
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Good: Contributing guide explains how to run tests.
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • create_branch.sh
  • finish_task.sh
  • jest.e2e.config.js
  • jest.int.config.js
  • jest.unit.config.js
  • LICENSE
  • package-lock.json
    Good: Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
  • package.json
    Good: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • setup_env.sh
  • shrimp-rules.md
  • skills-lock.json
  • tasks.json
  • tsconfig.json