spectreconsole/spectre.console

0

/ 100

Documentation94
Engineering68
Health100
C#11,508MIT5d ago
Grade a repo

Popular and well-maintained. A little polish away from elite status.

A .NET library that makes it easier to create beautiful console applications.

Documentation

94

Contributing guide5pt80

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

68

Reproducibility6pt0

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

→ Enable and commit packages.lock.json so NuGet restores are repeatable.

CI/CD14pt57

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yaml).

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (src/Spectre.Console.Ansi.Tests/AnsiMarkupTests.cs).

Linting and formatting5pt100

.NET formatting configured (.editorconfig).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (src/Benchmarks/Benchmarks.csproj).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository files19 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yaml).
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • resources
  • src
    Good: Test files detected (src/Spectre.Console.Ansi.Tests/AnsiMarkupTests.cs).
    Good: Dependency manifest found (src/Benchmarks/Benchmarks.csproj).
  • .editorconfig
    Good: .NET formatting configured (.editorconfig).
  • .git-blame-ignore-revs
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • build.cs
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
    Good: Code of conduct present.
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Good: Contributing guide describes code style expectations.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
  • dotnet-tools.json
  • global.json
  • LICENSE.md
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • NuGet.Config
  • README.fa.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • README.jp.md
  • README.md
  • README.pt-BR.md
  • README.zh.md