Popular for its size, but the engineering basics lag behind the interest.
A standard library of components to model the world and beyond
Documentation
69
No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).
→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.
README documents how to install the project.
README is present.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
48
No linter or formatter config found.
→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).
→ Commit the lockfile for this project's package manager so installs produce the same dependency versions everywhere.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/Tests.yml).
Test files detected (test).
Project health
68
No dependency manifest detected at root.
→ Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- —Commits (30d / 90d)
- 49Forks
- 65Releaseslatest 3y ago
Community
- —Community health
- —authors own >50% of commits
- 165Watchers
Responsiveness
- 1hMedian issue response
- 2hMedian PR merge time
- 64Open issues
Repository files9 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/Tests.yml).Good: Dependabot covers 2 ecosystems (github-actions, julia). Dependencies stay current.
- docs
- src
- testGood: Test files detected (test).
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .typos.toml
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under MIT.
- Project.toml
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.