Solid engineering. The main gap is visibility.
An open source code editor for the web, written in JavaScript, HTML and CSS.
Documentation
87
Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
README is present.
README documents how to install the project.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
76
No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).
→ Commit package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, yarn.lock, or bun.lock so Node installs are repeatable.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
Test files detected (src/extensibility/node/spec).
CI is configured (.travis.yml).
Linter or formatter configured (.eslintrc.js).
Project health
49
No pushes in over 2 years. Looks unmaintained (−95 pts).
→ A recent commit signals the project is alive and worth using.
Repository has a description.
.gitignore present.
Dependency manifest found (package.json).
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- —Commits (30d / 90d)
- 0Forks
- 0Releases
Community
- —Community health
- —authors own >50% of commits
- 0Watchers
Responsiveness
- —Median issue response
- —Median PR merge time
- 0Open issues
Repository files23 root entries
- samples
- srcGood: Test files detected (src/extensibility/node/spec).Issue: Build artifacts or local files may be committed (src/extensions/default/StaticServer/node/node_modules/connect) (−40 pts).Fix: Remove them and add to .gitignore.
- tasks
- test
- tools
- .brackets.json
- .eslintignore
- .eslintrc.jsGood: Linter or formatter configured (.eslintrc.js).
- .gitattributes
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .gitmodules
- .npmrc
- .travis.ymlGood: CI is configured (.travis.yml).
- build.json
- CODE_OF_CONDUCT.mdGood: Code of conduct present.
- CONTRIBUTING.mdGood: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
- Gruntfile.js
- ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under MIT.
- NOTICE
- npm-shrinkwrap.json
- package.jsonGood: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.