Polished and well engineered. Punching above its star count.
super repo for rocm systems projects
Documentation
88
README is present.
Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
README documents how to install the project.
A license file is present.
Engineering
88
Test files detected (.github/scripts/tests).
CI is configured (.github/workflows/abi-compliance-check.yml).
Linter or formatter configured (emulation/mirage/dashboard/web/eslint.config.js).
Lockfile present (.github/requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
Issue or PR templates present.
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (.github/requirements.txt).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- —Commits (30d / 90d)
- 277Forks
- 11Releaseslatest 1mo ago
Community
- —Community health
- —authors own >50% of commits
- 412Watchers
Responsiveness
- <1hMedian issue response
- <1hMedian PR merge time
- 923Open issues
Repository files17 root entries
- .dvcGood: .gitignore present.
- .githubGood: Test files detected (.github/scripts/tests).Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/abi-compliance-check.yml).Good: Lockfile present (.github/requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.Good: Dependabot covers 12 ecosystems (github-actions, pip, pip, pip, pip, pip, pip, pip, pip, pip, pip, pip). Dependencies stay current.Good: Issue or PR templates present.Good: Dependency manifest found (.github/requirements.txt).
- docs
- emulationGood: A license file is present.Good: Linter or formatter configured (emulation/mirage/dashboard/web/eslint.config.js).Good: Environment pinned via emulation/Dockerfile.
- experimental
- profilers
- projectsGood: Code of conduct present.Good: Security policy present.
- python
- shared
- test
- .dvcignore
- .git-blame-ignore-revs
- .gitignore
- .gitmodules
- .pre-commit-config.yaml
- CONTRIBUTING.mdGood: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Issue: No live demo link in the README (−20 pts).Fix: Link to a deployed version, docs site, or demo video. Users want to see it running.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.