rinomakin21/w5-football-prediction

0

/ 100

Documentation70
Engineering9
Health100
Python15Other1d ago
Grade a repo

Some interest. A stronger README and CI would help.

⚽ Predict football match outcomes using the W-5 Multi-Agent AI Consensus Framework, achieving high accuracy with a blend of AI and machine learning techniques.

Documentation

70

README12pt55

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt55

README documents how to install the project.

License6pt100

Licensed under Other.

Contributing guide5pt100

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

Engineering

9

Tests18pt0

No tests detected anywhere in the repository.

→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.

CI/CD14pt0

No CI configuration detected in this repository.

→ If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Reproducibility6pt70

Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 3
    Forks
  • 0
    Releases

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 15
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 112d 15h
    Median issue response
  • —
    Median PR merge time
  • 5
    Open issues
Repository files18 root entries
  • data
  • docs
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.
    Good: Contributing guide describes code style expectations.
    Good: Contributing guide explains how to run tests.
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • examples
  • src
  • undiminishing
  • .env.example
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • CITATION.cff
  • GITHUB_RELEASE_GUIDE.md
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under Other.
  • PROJECT_STRATEGY.md
  • PROJECT_STRUCTURE.txt
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Issue: No live demo link in the README (−20 pts).Fix: Link to a deployed version, docs site, or demo video. Users want to see it running.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
  • requirements.txt
    Good: Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
    Good: Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).
  • robots.txt
  • SEO_QUICKSTART.md
  • SEO_STRATEGY.md
  • sitemap.xml