0
/ 100
Popular for its size, but the engineering basics lag behind the interest.
Worklog is a local-first desktop project manager for small development teams. It is built for fast, keyboard-first planning with a Kanban workflow and zero cloud dependency for core usage.
Documentation
78
No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).
→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.
README is present.
README documents how to install the project.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
25
No tests detected anywhere in the repository.
→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
No linter or formatter config found.
→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
Lockfile present (packages/site/bun.lock). Installs are reproducible.
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (packages/site/package.json).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 17Forks
- 42Releaseslatest 1mo ago
Community
- -Community health
- -authors own >50% of commits
- 208Watchers
Responsiveness
- 12hMedian issue response
- <1hMedian PR merge time
- 3Open issues
Repository files11 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
- .vscode
- docs
- packagesGood: Lockfile present (packages/site/bun.lock). Installs are reproducible.Good: Dependency manifest found (packages/site/package.json).
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .gitmodules
- aur
- CHANGELOG.md
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under MIT.
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- RELEASE.md