Popular for its size, but the engineering basics lag behind the interest.
Let MAUI Sherpa guide you through all your .NET MAUI dev environment needs!
Documentation
69
No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).
→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.
README documents how to install the project.
README is present.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
56
No .NET formatter configured.
→ Add an .editorconfig to define C# formatting rules and run `dotnet format` in CI.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).
→ Enable and commit packages.lock.json so NuGet restores are repeatable.
Test files detected (tests).
CI is configured (.github/workflows/build.yml).
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (MauiSherpa.sln).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- —Commits (30d / 90d)
- 17Forks
- 31Releaseslatest 4mo ago
Community
- —Community health
- —authors own >50% of commits
- 165Watchers
Responsiveness
- 9hMedian issue response
- <1hMedian PR merge time
- 19Open issues
Repository files18 root entries
- .claude
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/build.yml).Good: Dependabot covers 2 ecosystems (nuget, dotnet-sdk). Dependencies stay current.
- build
- docs
- src
- testsGood: Test files detected (tests).
- third_party
- website
- winget
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- AGENTS.md
- Directory.Build.props
- dotnet-tools.json
- global.json
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under MIT.
- MauiSherpa.slnGood: Dependency manifest found (MauiSherpa.sln).
- nuget.config
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.