0

/ 100

GradeA

Well engineered for its size. A portfolio piece worth showing off.

Metro-map-style SVG diagrams from Mermaid graph definitions, designed for visualizing bioinformatics pipeline workflows

Outstanding. A score of 96/100 puts this repo in a very small tier of truly well-engineered projects.

Documentation

93

README12pt90

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Contributing guide5pt100

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

Engineering

96

Reproducibility6pt70

Lockfile present (website/package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.

Tests18pt100

Test files detected (tests).

CI/CD14pt100

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (.prettierrc.js).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 5
    Forks
  • 24
    Releaseslatest 4mo ago

Community

  • -
    Community health
  • -
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 87
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 3h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 45
    Open issues
Repository files21 root entries
  • .claude
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • assets
  • docs
  • examples
  • scripts
  • src
  • tests
    Good: Test files detected (tests).
  • website
    Good: Lockfile present (website/package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .prettierignore
  • .prettierrc.js
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.prettierrc.js).
  • .test_durations
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CLAUDE.md
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.
    Good: Contributing guide describes code style expectations.
    Good: Contributing guide explains how to run tests.
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • DESIGN.md
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • prek.toml
  • pyproject.toml
    Good: Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.