open-run-org/archive

0

/ 100

Documentation76
Engineering14
Health53
Python89MIT1d ago
Grade a repo

Some interest. A stronger README and CI would help.

Documentation

76

Contributing guide5pt0

No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).

→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.

README12pt85

This repository is large enough that GitHub truncated the file tree. The scan is based on a partial file list, so some checks may under-report.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

14

Tests18pt0

No tests detected anywhere in the repository.

→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Reproducibility6pt22

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

→ Commit go.sum so Go module downloads are repeatable.

CI/CD14pt40

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yaml).

Project health

53

Dependency manifest6pt0

No dependency manifest detected at root.

→ Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.

Repository metadata5pt40

No repository description set on GitHub (−60 pts).

→ Add a one-line description in the repo Settings → About. It appears in search results and social previews.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 6
    Forks
  • 32
    Releaseslatest 5mo ago

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 89
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • —
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 4
    Open issues
Repository files12 root entries
  • .devcontainer
    Good: Environment pinned via .devcontainer/docker-compose.yaml.
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yaml).
    Good: Dependabot configured for github-actions.
  • cmd
  • configs
  • content
  • data
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • config.toml
  • Dockerfile.dev
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • Makefile
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.