neuromatchacademy/course-content-dl

0

/ 100

Documentation62
Engineering26
Health100
Jupyter Notebook807CC-BY-4.01d ago
Grade a repo

Popular for its size, but the engineering basics lag behind the interest.

NMA deep learning course

Documentation

62

Install and run instructions9pt0

No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).

→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.

Contributing guide5pt72

CONTRIBUTING guide found.

README12pt85

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under CC-BY-4.0.

Engineering

26

Tests18pt0

No tests detected anywhere in the repository.

→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

CI/CD14pt57

CI is configured (.github/workflows/download_slides.yml).

Reproducibility6pt80

Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 290
    Forks
  • 18
    Releaseslatest 11mo ago

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 807
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 16h
    Median issue response
  • 3h
    Median PR merge time
  • 9
    Open issues
Repository files12 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CONTRIBUTING guide found.
    Issue: CONTRIBUTING guide contents could not be read (−28 pts vs a readable file).Fix: Move the file to the repo root or docs/CONTRIBUTING.md so its setup, style, test, and PR sections can be graded.
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/download_slides.yml).
  • book
  • projects
  • tutorials
  • .all-contributorsrc
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • CNAME
  • environment.yml
    Good: Environment pinned via environment.yml.
  • LICENSE-CODE.md
  • LICENSE.md
    Good: Licensed under CC-BY-4.0.
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
  • requirements.txt
    Good: Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
    Good: Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).