Strong community interest, but tests, CI, or docs need work.
Awesome Security lists for SOC/CERT/CTI
Documentation
76
No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).
→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.
README is present.
README documents how to install the project.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
20
No tests detected anywhere in the repository.
→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
No linter or formatter config found.
→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/build-tor-history.yml).
Lockfile present (Lists/DYNDNS/dyn-dns-list-mthcht_corrected/scripts/package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (Lists/DYNDNS/dyn-dns-list-mthcht_corrected/scripts/package.json).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- —Commits (30d / 90d)
- 194Forks
- 1Releaseslatest 1y ago
Community
- —Community health
- —authors own >50% of commits
- 1,668Watchers
Responsiveness
- 9hMedian issue response
- 10hMedian PR merge time
- 22Open issues
Repository files6 root entries
- _utils
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/build-tor-history.yml).
- ListsGood: Lockfile present (Lists/DYNDNS/dyn-dns-list-mthcht_corrected/scripts/package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.Good: Dependency manifest found (Lists/DYNDNS/dyn-dns-list-mthcht_corrected/scripts/package.json).
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under MIT.
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.