A well-known project done right. Strong docs and solid engineering throughout.

Hand-crafted frontend development

Documentation

93

Contributing guide5pt72

CONTRIBUTING guide found.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

88

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (middleman-core/fixtures/ember-cli-app/test-app/tests).

CI/CD14pt85

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Ruby linting configured (.editorconfig).

Reproducibility6pt100

Lockfile present (Gemfile.lock). Installs are reproducible.

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

95

Activity5pt80

Actively maintained (pushed within 3 months).

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (Gemfile).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository files15 root entries
  • .devcontainer
    Good: Environment pinned via .devcontainer/Dockerfile.
  • .github
    Good: CONTRIBUTING guide found.
    Issue: CONTRIBUTING guide contents could not be read (−28 pts vs a readable file).Fix: Move the file to the repo root or docs/CONTRIBUTING.md so its setup, style, test, and PR sections can be graded.
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
    Good: Dependabot covers 2 ecosystems (bundler, github-actions). Dependencies stay current.
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • middleman
  • middleman-cli
  • middleman-core
    Good: Test files detected (middleman-core/fixtures/ember-cli-app/test-app/tests).
  • .editorconfig
    Good: Ruby linting configured (.editorconfig).
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • gem_rake_helper.rb
  • Gemfile
    Good: Dependency manifest found (Gemfile).
  • Gemfile.lock
    Good: Lockfile present (Gemfile.lock). Installs are reproducible.
  • LICENSE.md
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • Rakefile
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.