Popular for its size, but the engineering basics lag behind the interest.
Finding ClickFix and FakeCAPTCHA like it's 1999
Documentation
69
Contributing guidance is in the README, not a dedicated CONTRIBUTING.md (−20 pts).
→ Moving it to a CONTRIBUTING.md makes it easier to find and keeps the README focused. A dedicated file earns +47 pts base.
No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).
→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
README is present.
Licensed under Apache-2.0.
Engineering
25
No tests detected anywhere in the repository.
→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
No linter or formatter config found.
→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/nightly_run.yml).
Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- —Commits (30d / 90d)
- 18Forks
- 0Releases
Community
- —Community health
- —authors own >50% of commits
- 145Watchers
Responsiveness
- 7d 6hMedian issue response
- <1hMedian PR merge time
- 1Open issues
Repository files29 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/nightly_run.yml).
- .streamlit
- analysis
- assets
- bin
- config
- docs
- nightly_reports
- public
- static
- techniques
- templates
- ui
- .gitattributes
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- clickgrab.ps1
- clickgrab.py
- extractors.py
- latest_consolidated_report.json
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under Apache-2.0.
- Makefile
- models.py
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- redirect_follower.py
- redirect_tracker.py
- requirements.txtGood: Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.Good: Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).
- SCHEMA.md
- streamlit_app.py
- test_malicious.html