mahmoudz/porto

0

/ 100

Documentation47
Engineering20
Health89
1,640MIT1d ago
Grade a repo

Real traction, but rough engineering makes it hard for contributors to trust.

A software architectural pattern that provides a comprehensive set of guidelines, principles, and patterns to organize code for high scalability, maintainability and reusability.

Documentation

47

Install and run instructions9pt0

No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).

→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.

Contributing guide5pt0

No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).

→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.

README12pt75

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

20

Tests18pt0

No tests detected anywhere in the repository.

→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

CI/CD14pt40

CI is configured (.github/workflows/build-deploy-docs.yml).

Reproducibility6pt70

Lockfile present (yarn.lock). Installs are reproducible.

Project health

89

Repository metadata5pt60

Repository has a description.

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (docs/package.json).

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 178
    Forks
  • 0
    Releases

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 1,640
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 6d 20h
    Median issue response
  • 22h
    Median PR merge time
  • 0
    Open issues
Repository files6 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/build-deploy-docs.yml).
  • assets
  • docs
    Good: Dependency manifest found (docs/package.json).
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
  • yarn.lock
    Good: Lockfile present (yarn.lock). Installs are reproducible.