igerber/diff-diff
Grade a repo

0

/ 100

GradeA

Polished and well engineered. Punching above its star count.

Difference-in-Differences causal inference in Python. Callaway-Sant'Anna, Synthetic DiD, Honest DiD, event studies. sklearn-like API, validated against R.

Documentation94
Engineering86
Health100
Python272MITtoday

Documentation

94

Contributing guide5pt77

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

86

Reproducibility6pt20

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

→ Commit poetry.lock, uv.lock, pdm.lock, Pipfile.lock, conda-lock.yml, or another lockfile for your Python dependency manager.

CI/CD14pt85

CI is configured (.github/workflows/build-wheels.yml).

Tests18pt100

Test files detected (benchmarks/python/test_coverage_sdid.py).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured ([tool.ruff] / [tool.black] in pyproject.toml).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 39
    Forks
  • 71
    Releaseslatest 5mo ago

Community

  • -
    Community health
  • -
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 272
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 3d 13h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 2
    Open issues
Repository files29 root entries
  • .claude
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/build-wheels.yml).
    Good: Dependabot covers 3 ecosystems (pip, cargo, github-actions). Dependencies stay current.
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • benchmarks
    Good: Test files detected (benchmarks/python/test_coverage_sdid.py).
  • carousel
  • diff_diff
  • docs
  • rust
  • tests
  • tools
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .readthedocs.yaml
  • .zenodo.json
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CITATION.cff
  • CLAUDE.md
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
    Good: Code of conduct present.
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Good: Contributing guide explains how to run tests.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a PR workflow section (−8 pts).Fix: Explain how to fork, branch, and open a pull request so contributors know what to expect.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • CONTRIBUTORS.md
  • diff-diff.png
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • llms.txt
  • METHODOLOGY_REVIEW.md
  • paper.bib
  • paper.md
  • pyproject.toml
    Good: Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • ROADMAP.md
  • SECURITY.md
    Good: Security policy present.
  • TODO.md