gundulabs/gaze

0

/ 100

Documentation93
Engineering26
Health86
Rust78MIT1d ago
Grade a repo

Getting some notice. Tests and CI would be the fastest wins.

Facial authentication for Linux

Documentation

93

Contributing guide5pt72

CONTRIBUTING guide found.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

26

Tests18pt0

No tests detected anywhere in the repository.

→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter found.

→ Add ESLint (eslint.config.js) and/or Prettier (.prettierrc), install them as devDependencies, and add a `lint` script to package.json.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

CI/CD14pt57

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).

Reproducibility6pt80

Lockfile present (Cargo.lock). Installs are reproducible.

Project health

86

Dependency manifest6pt55

Dependency manifest found (Cargo.toml).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 1
    Forks
  • 1
    Releaseslatest 1mo ago

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 78
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 12h
    Median issue response
  • 1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 3
    Open issues
Repository files26 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
  • docs
    Good: CONTRIBUTING guide found.
    Issue: CONTRIBUTING guide contents could not be read (−28 pts vs a readable file).Fix: Move the file to the repo root or docs/CONTRIBUTING.md so its setup, style, test, and PR sections can be graded.
  • gaze
  • gaze-cli
  • gaze-core
  • gaze-gui
  • gnome-shell-extension
  • packaging
  • pam-gaze
  • pam-gaze-core
  • pam-gaze-grosshack
  • scripts
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • AGENTS.md
  • bun.lock
  • Cargo.lock
    Good: Lockfile present (Cargo.lock). Installs are reproducible.
  • Cargo.toml
    Good: Dependency manifest found (Cargo.toml).
  • CLAUDE.md
  • GEMINI.md
  • Justfile
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • mise.toml
    Good: Environment pinned via mise.toml.
  • package.json
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • renovate.json
  • wrangler.toml