esperanto/kurso-zagreba-metodo

0

/ 100

Documentation76
Engineering27
Health94
HTML185CC-BY-4.01d ago
Grade a repo

Popular for its size, but the engineering basics lag behind the interest.

Reta Esperanto-kurso laŭ la Zagreba Metodo

Documentation

76

Contributing guide5pt0

No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).

→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.

README12pt85

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

License6pt100

Licensed under CC-BY-4.0.

Engineering

27

Tests18pt0

No tests detected anywhere in the repository.

→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

CI/CD14pt57

CI is configured (.github/workflows/pages.yml).

Reproducibility6pt90

Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.

Project health

94

Housekeeping3pt60

.gitignore present.

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 52
    Forks
  • 0
    Releases

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 185
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 37d 5h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 13
    Open issues
Repository files18 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/pages.yml).
    Good: Dependabot covers 2 ecosystems (pip, github-actions). Dependencies stay current.
  • .idea
    Issue: Build artifacts or local files may be committed (.idea/.gitignore) (−40 pts).Fix: Remove them and add to .gitignore.
  • agordoj
  • enhavo
  • fonto
  • iloj
  • vendor
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • AGENTS.md
  • AUTHORS.md
  • KONTRIBUADO.md
  • LICENSE.md
    Good: Licensed under CC-BY-4.0.
  • Makefile
  • PERMESILO.md
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • redaktu.png
  • requirements.in
  • requirements.txt
    Good: Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
    Good: Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).