Good community traction and solid fundamentals. Nearly in the top tier.

An unofficial E-Hentai App for iOS built with SwiftUI & TCA.

Documentation

63

Contributing guide5pt0

No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).

Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.

Install and run instructions9pt45

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt85

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

78

Reproducibility6pt12

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

Commit Package.resolved for application projects so Swift Package Manager resolves the same versions.

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (EhPandaTests/Tests).

CI/CD14pt85

CI is configured (.github/workflows/test.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (.swiftlint.yml).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

68

Dependency manifest6pt0

No dependency manifest detected at root.

Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 248
    Forks
  • 102
    Releaseslatest 5y ago

Community

  • Community health
  • authors own >50% of commits
  • 3,874
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • <1h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 29
    Open issues
Repository files14 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/test.yml).
    Good: Dependabot configured for github-actions.
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • actions-tool
  • EhPanda
  • EhPanda.xcodeproj
  • EhPandaTests
    Good: Test files detected (EhPandaTests/Tests).
  • READMEs
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
  • ShareExtension
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .swiftlint.yml
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.swiftlint.yml).
  • AltStore.json
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • README.md
  • swiftgen.yml