Rough and inactive. Tests, CI, and a fuller README would revive it.
Documentation
79
No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).
→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.
README documents how to install the project.
README is present.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
58
No PHP linter or static analysis tool configured.
→ Add PHP_CodeSniffer (phpcs.xml) for style or PHPStan (phpstan.neon) for static analysis. Run either in CI.
No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).
→ Commit composer.lock so Composer installs are repeatable.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
Test files detected (phpunit.xml).
CI is configured (.travis.yml).
Project health
59
No pushes in over 2 years. Looks unmaintained (−95 pts).
→ A recent commit signals the project is alive and worth using.
No repository description set on GitHub (−60 pts).
→ Add a one-line description in the repo Settings → About. It appears in search results and social previews.
Dependency manifest found (composer.json).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- —Commits (30d / 90d)
- 0Forks
- 0Releases
Community
- —Community health
- —authors own >50% of commits
- 0Watchers
Responsiveness
- —Median issue response
- —Median PR merge time
- 0Open issues
Repository files11 root entries
- src
- tests
- .gitattributes
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .scrutinizer.yml
- .travis.ymlGood: CI is configured (.travis.yml).
- CHANGELOG.md
- composer.jsonGood: Dependency manifest found (composer.json).
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under MIT.
- phpunit.xmlGood: Test files detected (phpunit.xml).
- README.mdGood: README is present.Issue: README has some structure (−7 pts). 2-3 headings earns partial credit; 4+ earns the full +15 pts.Fix: Add more sections (Overview, Install, Usage, Contributing) using ## headings.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.