0
/ 100
Some interest. A stronger README and CI would help.
A packet sniffer (also known as an IP sniffer/puller) specifically designed for Peer-To-Peer (P2P) video games on PC and consoles (PlayStation and Xbox).
Documentation
51
No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).
→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).
→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.
README is present.
Licensed under GPL-3.0.
Engineering
22
No tests detected anywhere in the repository.
→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).
→ Commit poetry.lock, uv.lock, pdm.lock, Pipfile.lock, conda-lock.yml, or another lockfile for your Python dependency manager.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/build.yml).
Linter or formatter configured (.flake8).
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 17Forks
- 49Releaseslatest 2y ago
Community
- -Community health
- -authors own >50% of commits
- 87Watchers
Responsiveness
- <1hMedian issue response
- 1hMedian PR merge time
- 1Open issues
Repository files15 root entries
- .dev
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/build.yml).
- .vscode
- bin
- resources
- scripts
- src
- .flake8Good: Linter or formatter configured (.flake8).
- .gitattributes
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- check_project_dependencies.ps1
- code-quality-checks.ps1
- COPYING
- pyproject.tomlGood: Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.