atrefzer/csharpcodeanalyst

0

/ 100

Documentation65
Engineering65
Health100
JavaScript8GPL-3.04d ago
Grade a repo

Solid engineering. The main gap is visibility.

C# dependency analyzer

Documentation

65

Contributing guide5pt0

No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).

→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.

Install and run instructions9pt45

No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).

→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.

README12pt90

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under GPL-3.0.

Engineering

65

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Reproducibility6pt12

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

→ Enable and commit packages.lock.json so NuGet restores are repeatable.

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (Tests).

CI/CD14pt85

CI is configured (.github/workflows/code-review.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

.NET formatting configured (.editorconfig).

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (CSharpCodeAnalyst.sln).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 3
    Forks
  • —
    Releases

Community

  • 42% - Weak
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 8
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • —
    Median issue response
  • —
    Median PR merge time
  • 0
    Open issues
Repository files18 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/code-review.yml).
    Good: Dependabot configured for nuget.
  • ApprovalTestTool
  • CodeGraph
  • CodeParser
  • CSharpCodeAnalyst
  • Documentation
  • Tests
    Good: Test files detected (Tests).
  • TestSuite
  • ThirdPartyNotices
  • .editorconfig
    Good: .NET formatting configured (.editorconfig).
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • CLAUDE.md
  • CSharpCodeAnalyst.sln
    Good: Dependency manifest found (CSharpCodeAnalyst.sln).
  • CSharpCodeAnalyst.sln.DotSettings
  • Directory.Build.props
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under GPL-3.0.
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.