Popular and well-maintained. A little polish away from elite status.
A monitor of resources
Documentation
94
Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
README documents how to install the project.
README is present.
Licensed under Apache-2.0.
Engineering
68
No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).
→ Commit the lockfile for this project's package manager so installs produce the same dependency versions everywhere.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/test-snap-can-build.yml).
Test files detected (tests).
Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).
Issue or PR templates present.
Project health
68
No dependency manifest detected at root.
→ Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository files20 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/test-snap-can-build.yml).Good: Issue or PR templates present.
- cmake
- Img
- include
- snap
- src
- testsGood: Test files detected (tests).
- themes
- .editorconfigGood: Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- ansi_banner.utf8
- btop.desktop
- CHANGELOG.md
- CMakeLists.txt
- CODE_OF_CONDUCT.mdGood: Code of conduct present.
- CONTRIBUTING.mdGood: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.Good: Contributing guide describes code style expectations.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under Apache-2.0.
- Makefile
- manpage.md
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.