Good community traction and solid fundamentals. Nearly in the top tier.

A performance dashboard for Postgres

Documentation

74

Install and run instructions9pt45

README documents how to install the project.

Contributing guide5pt66

Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.

Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.

README12pt85

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

66

Linting and formatting5pt0

No RuboCop config found.

Add a .rubocop.yml and run `rubocop` in CI to enforce consistent Ruby style.

Reproducibility6pt0

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

Commit Gemfile.lock so Bundler installs are repeatable.

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (test).

CI/CD14pt85

CI is configured (.github/workflows/build.yml).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

95

Activity5pt80

Actively maintained (pushed within 3 months).

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (Gemfile).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository files17 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/build.yml).
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • app
  • config
  • gemfiles
  • guides
  • lib
  • licenses
  • test
    Good: Test files detected (test).
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Issue: Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • Gemfile
    Good: Dependency manifest found (Gemfile).
  • LICENSE.txt
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • pghero.gemspec
  • Rakefile
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.