1rgs/claude-code-proxy

0

/ 100

Documentation66
Engineering21
Health93
Python3,6491d ago
Grade a repo

Real traction, but rough engineering makes it hard for contributors to trust.

Run Claude Code on OpenAI models

Documentation

66

License6pt0

No license detected.

→ Add a LICENSE file. Without one, nobody can legally use, copy, or contribute to your code.

Contributing guide5pt25

Contributing guidance is in the README, not a dedicated CONTRIBUTING.md (−20 pts).

→ Moving it to a CONTRIBUTING.md makes it easier to find and keeps the README focused. A dedicated file earns +47 pts base.

README12pt90

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt100

README documents how to install the project.

Engineering

21

Tests18pt0

No tests detected anywhere in the repository.

→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter configured.

→ Add [tool.ruff] to pyproject.toml. Ruff handles linting and formatting in one tool and replaces flake8, isort, and black.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

CI/CD14pt40

CI is configured (.github/workflows/publish.yml).

Reproducibility6pt80

Lockfile present (uv.lock). Installs are reproducible.

Project health

93

Dependency manifest6pt79

Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 473
    Forks
  • 0
    Releases

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 3,649
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 4d 6h
    Median issue response
  • 47d 10h
    Median PR merge time
  • 64
    Open issues
Repository files12 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/publish.yml).
  • .dockerignore
  • .env.example
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .python-version
  • Dockerfile
    Good: Environment pinned via Dockerfile.
  • pic.png
  • pyproject.toml
    Good: Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • server.py
  • tests.py
  • uv.lock
    Good: Lockfile present (uv.lock). Installs are reproducible.